Daydream Tourist

The Scrovegni Chapel: My Moment with Giotto’s Masterpiece

Advertisements

To enter the Scrovegni Chapel, you have to spend 15 minutes in a “environmental equilibration” chamber and video introduction before passing through two air locks into the chapel.  Shockingly, visitors only get another 15 minutes to look around before being rushed out by security.  However, if you are a clever art pilgrim (like yours truly) and book multiple back-to-back tickets, the museum escort chases everyone else out but leaves you alone for a few glorious minutes within the chapel.

Standing at the altar looking down the rows of painted vignettes, the rich pastel colors glowing warmly from the morning sunlight, has got to be one of the most profoundly beautiful art experience I have ever had.  To say I loved the Scrovegni Chapel would be an understatement.

Photo of Giotto’s masterpiece, the Scrovegni Chapel in Padua (Photo: Art Bouillon)

As I mentioned before my trip, the Scrovegni Chapel (or Arena Chapel) was commissioned by Enrico Scrovegni in 1300 as a funerary church for his family.  He hired Giotto di Bondone at the height of this artistic career to fresco the entire interior of the chapel with scenes from the lives of Mary and Jesus.  Giotto was a talented and innovative artist who broke away from the Gothic style prevalent at the time.  The Scrovegni Chapel is considered Giotto’s masterwork because of the completeness of the decoration and thoroughness of the composition.  The Chapel also received a complete restoration several years ago to remove salts that were rising to the surface, to consolidate paint loss, and fix cracks and other structural damage to the chapel.  It is brilliant thing to see!

The Arena Chapel doesn’t look like much for the outside, but… (Photo)

No Photograph Has Ever Reproduced the Chapel’s Colors

I am going to use images of the chapel in this article, but just so you know, none of these pictures truly capture the color of the interior.  Without a doubt, the color completely blew me away.  No published image comes close to the rich, warm colors in these frescoes.  (And since cameras are allowed, you’re going to have to trust me.)

The delicate transition of color in the robes was elegant.  Giotto di Bondone, “Scenes from the Life of Joachim. 2: Joachim among the Shepherds” (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

I visited in the late morning so there was daylight filtering into the church nave.  The red and orange robes had depth and weight.  They were soft but with tangible volume and overall just gorgeous.

Giotto painted colors by simply varying the amount of pigment used rather than mixing in white or black pigments to darken or lighten.  The fullness and movement of the robes comes from this subtle variation in tone of the pigment.  It was masterfully executed by Giotto and expertly revealed by a very successful, modern restoration.

I don’t remember the damage being this obvious in real life. Giotto di Bondone “Scenes from the Life of Christ: 9. Raising of Lazarus” (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

Looking at a lot of images of the chapel, the damage (even after restoration) appears too stark and the colors too dark.  Sure a lot of this damage still exists but it is really not so pronounced in natural sunlight.  In person, the colors breath and blend and soften.  It’s as if a camera captures a single frame of something in motion.  The photos really are no comparison for seeing the chapel in real life.

Why We Say Giotto Started the Renaissance

Art history teaches that Giotto was the artistic tipping point that ushered in the Renaissance.  While the Byzantine-Gothic formula for depicting figures was starting to crack with his teacher Cimabue, it was Giotto who introduced naturalism back to the visuals arts.  Analysis of Giotto’s work always points to the emotion in his figures, specifically anguish among the lamenting friends around the cross in the Scrovegni Chapel.

Mary caresses and cries over the body of a very dead looking Jesus. Giotto di Bondone, “Scenes from the Life of Christ: 20. Lamentation”, 1304-1306, Scrovegni Chapel, Padua (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

It’s hard not to appreciate the pain in this scene.  Here are furrowed brows, tearful eyes, and twisted mouths which don’t appear in Italian Gothic or Byzantine of the previous century.  It is very easy to point to these figures as an example of naturalism and human emotion to art, but I think this misses the true genius of Giotto.  He was an artist of subtlety and nuance which was even more radical in an age when Saints held their murder weapons against a golden backdrop.

Standing in the Chapel itself, there was another even more dramatic panel that demonstrated a greater depth of human understanding.  The massive artistic leap forward in the Scrovegni Chapel is a panel that demonstrates true insight into the human psyche: “Scenes from the Life of Christ – Washing of Feet”.

Giotto di Bondone, “Scenes from the Life of Christ: 14. Washing of Feet”, 1304-1306, Scrovegni Chapel, Padua (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

Thinking historically to the life of Jesus, one’s feet became incredibly dirty walking around.  It was an act of hospitality and humility to wash the feet of others.  Before the Passover meal in the Passion story, Jesus told his 12 disciples that he was going to hand-wash their feet.

In Giotto’s version, each figure react uniquely to this strange event.  Two younger apostles stand to the left of Jesus with water jugs clearly helping the process along; you can just make out a faint smile on one of them.  Behind and on the far left, a man with wild gray hair is untying his sandals enthusiastically while the men above him watch with worried expressions.

Giotto di Bondone, “Scenes from the Life of Christ: 14. Washing of Feet (detail)”, 1304-1306, Scrovegni Chapel, Padua (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

My favorite figures are right around Jesus.  With Peter’s leg in hand, Jesus tries to reassure him.  Yet even as he holds up his robe, Peter is literally scratching his head.  There is confusion but willingness in his direct stare and furrowed brow.  Behind them, the man in blue conceals his bare feet perhaps feeling unworthy or embarrassed and seems to be contemplating what his turn will mean.  To his right, the man in purple looks anxiously away.  His hands are wrapped in his robe as if to show that he does not want to and will not take off his sandals.  Giotto has managed to convey a lot of the emotionally subtle and theologically complex elements in this scene.   By comparison, painting someone crying now seems less impressive.

Giotto di Bondone, “Scenes from the Life of Christ: 22. Ascension (detail)”, 1304-1306, Scrovegni Chapel, Padua (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

The other piece of “naturalism” that made me laugh was in “Scenes from the Life of Christ – Ascension”.  Jesus is being taken up to Heaven surrounded in a brilliant halo, and the apostles below are raising their hands to protect their eyes from the light.  What an incredibly intuitive detail!  This is of course what a human would do in the presence of blinding light and demonstrates a big departure from the gold, semi-divine world of Gothic panel paintings.

My Favorite Panel

It’s tough to have a favorite panel, but I definitely left the Scrovegni Chapel with a new appreciation for “Scenes from the Life of Christ – Resurrection.”  Based on the Gospel of John, Jesus appears to women weeping at his tomb just after the resurrection.  Mary Magdalene recognizes Jesus, calls out to him, and is told not to touch him because it is not yet time.  It’s a strange exchange but has become popular in art as the “noli me tangere” or “touch me not” scene.

Giotto di Bondone, “Scenes from the Life of Christ: 21. Resurrection (Noli me tangere)”, 1304-1306, Scrovegni Chapel, Padua (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

Giotto’s Mary is just incredible.  Kneeling, she is almost completed concealed by her red robe.  Her little face peers out followed by two jutting, almost disembodied pink arms.  Unlike future noli me tangere Marys who will gesture gracefully for Jesus, Giotto’s Mary is really grasping with desperate, outstretched, and nearly straight arms.  Her expression combines disbelief with a wondrous hope; her eyes are locked in on Jesus’s face.

Detail of Mary from Giotto di Bondone, “Scenes from the Life of Christ: 21. Resurrection (Noli me tangere)”, 1304-1306, Scrovegni Chapel, Padua (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

Almost as much as Mary is reaching out, Jesus seems to be running away.  I only really noticed this in front of the panel, but he is literally out of the frame.  Jesus’ arm and the very top of his victory banner are cut off by the edge of the panel.  The sharp angle of this right leg makes it look like Jesus is trying to get away – and fast!  Even with the urgent getaway, there is a kindness in his face that reminds us of the underlying reunion actually occurring here.

Detail of Jesus from Giotto di Bondone, “Scenes from the Life of Christ: 21. Resurrection (Noli me tangere)”, 1304-1306, Scrovegni Chapel, Padua (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

Looking at the lay-out, this composition is a huge departure from Gothic art.  The tense, non-physical interaction between Mary and Jesus only takes up a quarter of the image.  They are balanced by sleeping soldier to the left and an empty blue sky above which takes up almost half the painting.  It’s a daring lay-out that relegates the action to the corner and intensifies the fleetingness of this chance encounter.  It was really exciting to experience this insight and enjoy this painting in person.

The Little Things

Saint from “The Last Judgment” with halo shadow (Photo: Web Gallery of Art)

There are several other details that you only notice when you can walk around the images. For example, the halos are all painted over raised fresco ridges which is a Byzantine convention.  This makes for an interesting juxtaposition of traditional art elements and Giotto’s innovative imagery.  Alternatively, Judas’ halo loses the ridge and becomes just a painted dark saucer at the beginning of the Passion narrative images.  I wonder if Giotto originally intended to remove Judas’ halo but for visual consistency it was added later, or if Giotto always expected to depict Judas with a waning halo leading to the Betrayal?

There are also mirrors set into the plaster of Jesus’ halo in the Last Judgement scene on the back wall.  Imagine the sunlight hitting that every day and radiating out!  I also really liked the goofy camels that look like donkeys in the Nativity and the fat peasants in the Wedding at Cana panel.  Viewing the paintings at their real size you can also appreciate the Hieronymus Bosh-like demons torturing the damned in the Last Judgement which include one like monster that I can only describe as “Hell’s Armadillo”.

Enjoy a Visit

An unidentified woman (i.e. not me) looks at the Giotto frescoes at the Scrovegni Chapel, in Padua, northern Italy (Photo: AP via The Telegraph)

If you find yourself anywhere remotely near Padua, then it’s worth a side trip to visit the Scrovegni  Chapel (aka the Arena Chapel).  I thought Giotto’s frescoes were more impressive than the Sistine Chapel and the space more breathtaking than many of the greatest churches.

Just remember to book your tickets in advance and to stretch your neck out beforehand because you won’t look down for a second.  And of course, consider getting at least two sessions because 15 minutes will most definitely not be enough time.

Advertisements

Advertisements